Prévention de la radicalisation violente en milieu scolaire : l’impact de la pièce de théâtre Qui a tué Freebird ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article rend compte de l’impact de la pièce « Qui a tué Freebird? », du Théâtre Parminou, sur les perceptions et les attitudes des jeunes et du personnel scolaire face à la radicalisation violente. Partant d’une méthodologie mixte, cet article révèle des différences régionales significatives au niveau des perceptions des jeunes et montre que la pièce a fait évoluer certaines attitudes. Les résultats suggèrent que la pièce a partiellement atteint ses objectifs en sensibilisant les jeunes et les acteurs scolaires à certains des risques associés aux mouvances extrémistes. Ils illustrent aussi qu’une complexification de la figure de l’étranger est possible au travers d’activités qui déconstruisent les stéréotypes et que les stratégies de prévention doivent viser les représentations régionales spécifiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".