À la rencontre de l’Autre : l’apport pédagogique d’un jumelage interculturel ponctuel dans un programme communautaire pendant la formation initiale des enseignants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les apports d’un modèle de jumelage interculturel ponctuel dans un programme communautaire, offert à des étudiants de première année d’un programme de formation de maître du secondaire. Une analyse de contenu des travaux réflexifs d’étudiants a permis de dégager quatre thèmes clés : la relation éducative, l’immigration, l’identité professionnelle ainsi que le milieu communautaire. Les résultats soutiennent que cette expérience de jumelage interculturel ponctuel a permis aux étudiants universitaires de se questionner par rapport à leur posture envers les adolescents issus de l’immigration, favoriser le développement de leur identité professionnelle, et leur a permis de se familiariser avec le rôle complémentaire des organismes communautaires au milieu scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".