Regards croisés sur les pratiques de différenciation pédagogique favorisant l’inclusion scolaire des élèves doués au primaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette étude vise à identifier les pratiques de différenciation pédagogique mises en place au primaire qui facilitent ou nuisent à l’inclusion des élèves doués en classe ordinaire. La collecte de données réalisée auprès de 24 élèves doués âgés de 6 à 11 ans, de leurs parents et de leurs enseignants comprend une entrevue semi-structurée, l’utilisation du WISC-VCDN-F et du Système d’évaluation du comportement de l’enfant, BASC-3CNF. L’analyse qualitative du discours permet de croiser les différentes perspectives des acteurs. Le respect du rythme d’apprentissage, l’approndissement des contenus et la qualité de la relation enseignant-élève favorisent le sentiment d’inclusion de l’élève et son bien-être. À l’inverse, la répétition des contenus et les activités trop faciles sont perçues comme nuisibles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".