MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367154913 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2355_59

Large-scale thickened tailings delivery and distribution system upgrade and optimisation

2023· article· en· W4367154913 on OpenAlexaff
Sadegh Javadi Rudd, Behnam Pirouz, Alex Bibby, M Newby, Manlai Purevdorj

Bibliographic record

VenuePaste/˜Pœaste · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsBanff CentreGeomechanica (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUpgradeTailingsComputer scienceScale (ratio)Environmental scienceOperating systemMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the design aspects and challenges involved in upgrading an existing thickened tailings delivery and distribution infrastructure with the aim of utilising the system for a newly constructed tailings storage facility (TSF). The operation is Oyu Tolgoi, the largest copper and gold mine in the Inner Asia region with a total throughput of 40 Mtpa. The thickened tailings are currently discharged to the existing TSF cell at a solids concentration of 56 – 64%. Similar to the existing TSF cell, a new cell is designed as a turkey-nest-type TSF which will be raised annually using the mine waste. The new TSF cell is about 2 km long by 2 km wide and the tailings will be distributed to the TSF from the western and northern walls via multiple manifolds and spigots using a specifically designed linear distribution system. The proposed upgrades to the tailings delivery pipeline and the modified linear distribution system will significantly improve the operation of the existing tailings pumps and optimise the tailings deposition into the new TSF. The proposed modifications also minimise the need for relocation of the excessively large tailings pipes during the operational life of the TSF. The proposed upgrades and alterations to the existing infrastructures are discussed and presented in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.578

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaste/˜PœasteSame topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207