MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367154982 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2355_26

Improved slurry dewatering via process water conditioning: equipment sizing and tailings storage implications

2023· article· en· W4367154982 on OpenAlexaff
Ross G. de Kretser, Andrew Vietti, Fredré Dunn

Bibliographic record

VenuePaste/˜Pœaste · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsBanff CentreGeomechanica (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDewateringTailingsSizingSlurryConditioningWaste managementProcess (computing)Process engineeringEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceEngineeringComputer scienceMetallurgyEnvironmental engineeringChemistryGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential processing risks associated with the presence of dispersive, swelling clays in mineral orebodies are well known. Uncontrolled dispersion of such clays on contact with water results in problems including poor tailings dewatering and consolidation, increased reagent demand, dirty process water and reduced mineral recoveries and increased plant maintenance with associated economic, environmental and safety implications. Dispersive clays are typically managed via approaches including high dosages of both polymer coagulant and flocculants in thickening, high-pressure secondary dewatering steps such as pressure filtration, belt press filtration or centrifugation, or inline flocculation and deposition of thickened tailings. Commonly, the secondary dewatering step requires re-dosing of additional coagulant and/or flocculant to regenerate a flocculated structure to develop acceptable dewatering rates. An alternative, more proactive approach to managing tailings containing dispersive clays is to promote controlled dispersion of the clays by conditioning the process water circuit to induce a coagulative state in the clays on first contact, reducing clay breakup and ultra-fines generation during initial wetting of the ore on entry to the plant. Clay dispersion control via process water conditioning involves reagent dosing into the process water at only a single location, however, this delivers benefits at every stage of dewatering across the tailings management flow sheet. The potential site-wide benefits of this approach are demonstrated for the ClariVie44®process water conditioner, using a combination of flocculation and settling test results, compression-permeability testwork and pressure filtration model simulations from a range of different tailings samples. The benefits demonstrated include step changes in thickener fines capture and overflow clarity, material improvements in process plant operability and reduced down time due lower fines recirculation, elimination of coagulant dosing in the thickener and downstream secondary dewatering operations, increases in pressure filtration throughputs of up to 300%, improvements in any process technology employing secondary flocculation due to more homogenous structure development, and improved tailings storage facility (TSF) operability and lower risk due to less segregation, faster consolidation and operational dry densities and improved decant water management. Test data from the Jagersfontein kimberlite tailings are also discussed in the context of the recent TSF failure and the potential role of dispersive clays as a risk factor at this site.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.769

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaste/˜PœasteSame topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207