MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367155052 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/2355_06

The benefit of delithiated beta spodumene to reduce the carbon footprint of cemented paste backfill

2023· article· en· W4367155052 on OpenAlexaff
Aminhossein Safarizadeh, Hazel Lim

Bibliographic record

VenuePaste/˜Pœaste · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsBanff CentreGeomechanica (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon footprintFootprintSpodumeneCarbon fibersGeologyMining engineeringEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMetallurgyComposite materialComposite number

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Delithiated beta spodumene (DBS) is the leach residue produced after lithium refining. It represents the largest material stream produced in the process; approximately seven to ten tonnes of DBS is generated per tonne of lithium hydroxide monohydrate produced. The material is characterised as pozzolanic and is featured in the recently published standard AS3582.4:2022 Supplementary cementitious material: Manufactured Pozzolans. This paper presents an experimental study on the strength behaviour of cemented paste backfill (CPB) containing DBS by investigating different CPB mix designs produced with nickel tailings, mine site-specific recycled process water, and various types of binders. The primary motivation of this collaborative research work was to find ways to reduce CPB’s carbon footprint by using locally sourced material as a binder additive. For this study, several laboratory tests were undertaken at the Nova nickel-copper mine to explore the use of DBS in paste fill design. DBS was used as a partial replacement material for ground granulated blast-furnace Slag (GGBFS) in 9:1 slag-lime binder and mixes with other cementitious binder types such as general purpose (GP), general blended (GB), high early strength (HE), and low heat (LH) cement. The results demonstrated that CPB samples with the DBS-GB, DBS-GP, DBS-HE and DBS-LH mixed binders showed promising results with DBS replacement ratios of up to 40 wt.%; however, CPB samples with the DBS- lime mixes failed to perform to an acceptable strength. Nevertheless, these performed well in achieving the compressive strength required for use at the Nova mine site. At 40 wt.% binder replacement with DBS, paste CO2 emission will be reduced by around 28%. Future studies may consider the long-term performance and other mining applications of DBS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaste/˜PœasteSame topicTailings Management and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207