MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367157260 · doi:10.7202/1091918ar

Un féminisme matérialiste décolonial est possible

2022· article· fr· W4367157260 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jules Falquet

Bibliographic record

VenueCahiers de recherche sociologique · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Gender and Feminism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jules Falquet propose de lire ensemble la sociologue française Colette Guillaumin et la philosophe argentine María Lugones, pour avancer dans l’élaboration d’une analyse féministe matérialiste décoloniale. Après avoir résumé leurs analyses respectives du sexe et de la race, Falquet souligne leurs convergences, notamment la commune profondeur historique de leurs travaux, ancrés dans le processus de colonisation européenne de l’Amérique latine et des Caraïbes, incluant la traite et l’esclavage, mais aussi leurs divergences sur les logiques causales de la mise en place du système-monde capitaliste. Elle propose enfin une image, les vases communicants, et un concept, la combinatoire straight , pour tenir ensemble sexe, race et classe et revisiter l’histoire du développement du mode de production capitaliste à partir de cette histoire coloniale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.173
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCahiers de recherche sociologiqueSame topicHistorical Gender and Feminism StudiesFrench-language works237,207