MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367157331 · doi:10.7202/1092228ar

Le colonialisme, le postcolonialisme et le féminisme : un discours féministe en Afrique francophone subsaharienne

2022· article· fr· W4367157331 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gertrude Mianda

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteure offre un texte qui souligne l’édification du discours féministe dans l’Afrique francophone subsaharienne postcoloniale. En partant des premières publications subversives produites par les Africaines sur la condition sociale des femmes, elle fait ressortir leur apport aux études féministes. Deux essais, La parole aux négresses d’Awa Thiam (1978) et Lettre d’une Africaine à ses soeurs occidentales de Calixte Beyala (1995), ainsi que deux romans, Une si longue lettre de Mariama Bâ (1979) et Elle sera de jaspe et de corail. Journal d’une misovire de WereWere Liking (1983), servent de grille d’entrée afin de suivre dans sa trajectoire la construction de ce discours féministe africain. Ainsi, l’exploration de ces quatre ouvrages permet de rendre visible et audible la contribution invisibilisée des Africaines à la francophonie féministe blanche dominante. Par ailleurs, l’auteure montre que le discours féministe africain, dans sa formulation, est résistant à l’égard de certains principes du féminisme blanc dominant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.346

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicFeminism, Gender, and Sexuality StudiesFrench-language works237,207