La bibliothèque du compositeur : Vincent d’Indy, ses lectures épiques et « l’épopée musicale »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les bibliothèques de compositeurs, comme ensembles de textes, n’ont connu que peu d’investigations, entraînant alors un manque de reconnaissance de leurs valeurs intellectuelle et herméneutique en musicologie. Or, depuis le XIX e siècle, à la suite du développement de la musicologie et de l’appropriation de la critique musicale par les musiciens, le compositeur n’est plus seulement artisan mais penseur de son art : il se fait intellectuel. L’examen de la bibliothèque de Vincent d’Indy (1851–1931), joint à celui de ses écrits, permet de préciser une dynamique intellectuelle propre à ce compositeur, et plus précisément de révéler la dimension épique primordiale à la bibliothèque qui se situe ainsi à l’origine d’une réflexion croisée sur l’épopée littéraire et ce que d’Indy nomme « l’épopée musicale ».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".