MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367158754 · doi:10.1021/cen-09933-buscon14

Thermo Fisher gets pipette-tip contract

2021· article· en· W4367158754 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael McCoy

Bibliographic record

VenueC&EN Global Enterprise · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiotechnology and Related Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPipetteEconomic shortageInvestment (military)Quarter (Canadian coin)BusinessOperations managementEconomicsChemistryArchaeologyGeographyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The US Department of Defense has awarded Thermo Fisher Scientific a $192.5 million contract to expand US production of pipette tips. Thermo Fisher says it will build a facility in North Carolina that will start making the tips as early as the third quarter of 2023. Last year the firm announced its own $140 million investment in laboratory plastics, including pipette tips. The US is experiencing a shortage of the tips, in part because of increased use for COVID-19 testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.743

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4790.370

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueC&EN Global EnterpriseSame topicBiotechnology and Related FieldsFrench-language works237,207