MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367158766 · doi:10.7202/1081346ar

Jerome H. BARKOW, Darwin, Sex and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989, 435 pp., $45.00 (cloth)

2021· article· en· W4367158766 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pamela R. Willoughby

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDarwin (ADL)Charles darwinSociologyEnvironmental ethicsGerontologyPhilosophyMedicineDarwinismEngineeringEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jerome H. BARKOW, Darwin, Sex and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989, 435 pp., $45.00 (cloth). Un article de la revue Culture (Volume 10, numéro 2, 1990, p. 3-130) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCultureSame topicEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and BeyondFrench-language works237,207