Jacqueline PETERSON, Jennifer S. H. BROWN (eds.), The New Peoples: Being and Becoming Metis in North America, Winnipeg, University of Manitoba Press, 1985. 266 pages, $25.00 (cloth) / F. Laurie BARON, James B. WALDRAM (eds.), 1885 and After: Native Society in Transition, Regina : Canadian Plains Research Center, 1986. 306 pages, Can. $15.00 (paper) / Dolores T. POELZER, Irene A. POELZER. In Our Own Words: Northern Saskatchewan Metis Women Speak Out. Saskatoon : Lindenblatt and Hamonic Publishing Inc., 1986, 161 pages, $12.95 (paper)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jacqueline PETERSON, Jennifer S. H. BROWN (eds.), The New Peoples: Being and Becoming Metis in North America, Winnipeg, University of Manitoba Press, 1985. 266 pages, $25.00 (cloth) / F. Laurie BARON, James B. WALDRAM (eds.), 1885 and After: Native Society in Transition, Regina : Canadian Plains Research Center, 1986. 306 pages, Can. $15.00 (paper) / Dolores T. POELZER, Irene A. POELZER. In Our Own Words: Northern Saskatchewan Metis Women Speak Out. Saskatoon : Lindenblatt and Hamonic Publishing Inc., 1986, 161 pages, $12.95 (paper). Un article de la revue Culture (Volume 7, numéro 1, 1987, p. 3-89) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".