MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367159468 · doi:10.7202/1077272ar

La différenciation de la paysannerie montréalaise au XIXe siècle : le problème et les faits

2021· article· fr· W4367159468 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lise Pilon-Lê

Bibliographic record

VenueCulture · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les paysans forment-ils un ensemble homogène et égalitaire ou un ensemble hétérogène composé de couches ou classes sociales distinctes ? Les culturalistes, les populistes et les marxistes russes du début du siècle apportent des réponses opposées au problème. L’examen de leurs prémisses et de leurs conclusions révèle que seule la théorie marxiste permet la reconnaissance du phénomène et sa mesure empirique. La critique des prémisses et de la méthodologie de Lénine nous conduit à proposer des moyens empiriques de mesurer la différentiation parmi les paysans québécois au cours du XIXe siècle en tenant compte de l’évolution spécifique de l’agriculture au Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCultureSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207