MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367164026 · doi:10.59205/rp.v9i24.5

Introduciendo el Marco de Trabajo Positivo (MTP) en Guatemala

2019· article· es· W4367164026 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Laurie, Viviane Yvette Bolaños Gramajo

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Psicólogos · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicStress and Burnout Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPsychologyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los ambientes de trabajo positivos conducen a incrementos en la satisfacción laboral y al compromiso de los empleados, junto con disminuciones en el ausentismo, presentismo, la rotación de personal y costos de salud debido al estrés y a otros problemas mentales. A su vez, estos cambios conducen a un incremento de productividad y reducen los costos para los empleadores. El Marco de Trabajo Positivo (MTP) y su plataforma en línea se han desarrollado para optimizar el bienestar, el compromiso y el rendimiento de los empleados. El MTP consta de tres componentes: bienestar mental, resiliencia y liderazgo positivo. Se presenta una descripción general de cada componente del MTP y sus cuestionarios validados, el Inventario de Bienestar Mental y Resiliencia (IBMR) y el Inventario de Liderazgo Positivo (ILP). También se describe cómo se implementa el MTP en las organizaciones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista PsicólogosSame topicStress and Burnout ResearchFrench-language works237,207