MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367164228 · doi:10.4337/9781782547662.00021

Index

2013· paratext· en· W4367164228 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooks · 2013
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal case studies and regulations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndex (typography)Computer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Action Plan for Creating a Smart Border (US-Canada) 238-9 AD v Refugee Applications Commissioner [2009] 37-8 Afghanistan crisis conscientious objectors and jus ad bellum 182-6 political situation, analysis 58-60 refugees EU subsidiary protections 54-61 political influences on 52-3 status, analysis of 58-9 trends 52-3 UNHCR protection guidelines 57-9 war refugees, as special cases 52-5 Agamben, Giorgio 24-6 AK (Art 15(c)) Afghanistan CG [2012] 53, 59-60 Albania, human trafficking 159-62 and internal relocation 160-61 state obligations and prevention measures 161-2 Aleinikoff, T.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdward Elgar Publishing eBooksSame topicLegal case studies and regulationsFrench-language works237,207