MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367171754 · doi:10.18280/mmep.100218

Design and Analytical Study to Improve the Ingredients of the 2012 Honda Accord's Double Wishbone Suspension System

2023· article· en· W4367171754 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Applied Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuspension (topology)Automotive engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When a vehicle takes a turn at a high rate of speed, it is frequently rendered unstable, and the vehicle may lose touch with the way if the cornering is paired with a bump in the pavement.This can be especially dangerous if the vehicle is traveling in the opposite direction of the bump.The strategy asks for the design and manufacture of a suspension system and wheel assembly that are robust enough to withstand high speed cornering while also being able to ride comfortably over bumps of varied degrees of severity, Another crucial element of vehicle design is material choice since it allows us to lighten the vehicle while still maintaining the safety of the planned components, improving performance, We used the data and dimensions of the Honda Accord 2012, available in its own company, in our theoretical calculations to obtain the forces Depending on braking and bending conditions required to be applied to the components of the double wishbone suspension system which is made by solidworks2022 Where we selected the wishbone system's fundamental dimensions.Then, in order to determine the optimal materials for the Honda accord2012 double wishbone suspension system, a structural study is carried out with the aid of the ANSYS2021R2 program by modelling the loads exerted on just this suspension system individually using the wheel, wishbones, and knuckle.The suspension system's parts were then placed through some kind of series of quality control tests to make sure that only the best materials were utilized in their fabrication This is due to the fact that it is one of the most crucial sections of the vehicle.The results of this study were then used to refine the suspension system's design and select the best metals for it, by taking into account, among other things, the material's strength, cost of manufacture, weight, and availability.The purpose of the document, among other things, is to: A-Research all chassis parameters.B-Analyze a double wishbone suspension system parameter and try to optimize it.c) A study of the performance-influencing factors for the current suspension systems, d-To get the highest performance as well as material for a double wishbone suspension system, reduce or control the extent to which these aspects have an impact during the design phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it