MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367177475 · doi:10.5965/1414573101462023e0301

As particularidades do circo de rua: uma experiência

2023· article· pt· W4367177475 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueUrdimento · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhysical Education and Gymnastics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A rua apresenta-se ao artista circense como uma possibilidade de atuação democrática. Entretanto, ela requer conhecimentos específicos que nem sempre são oferecidos pelos espaços formativos. Apresento, aqui, um relato de experiência de pesquisa realizada no Summer Seminar Writing (about/on/with/at/the) Contemporary Circus, na Universidade de Concordia, em Montreal (Canadá). A experiência consistiu em submeter uma artista de circo com bom domínio de sua modalidade, mas sem experiência de circo de rua, a três incursões em um espaço público. Após cada incursão, a artista teve a colaboração de uma artista de rua experiente para readequar sua apresentação. Sem a pretensão de oferecer um manual de instruções ou determinar formas de atuação, busco refletir sobre a articulação da teoria com a prática, debatendo, ainda, alguns aspectos da práxis do circo de rua.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it