MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367178133 · doi:10.5965/1414573101462023e0701

Gestos avant-garde e contemporaneidade no circo de hoje

2023· article· pt· W4367178133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUrdimento · 2023
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhysical Education and Gymnastics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtModernism (music)Avant gardePhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O circo contemporâneo, baseando-se em práticas e aparelhos tradicionais e em várias de suas convenções espetaculares, enfatiza a performance de feitos humanos acrobáticos excepcionais, a engenhosidade ou a inventividade espetacular, muitas vezes contraintuitivas. O contemporâneo não é necessariamente avant-garde, mas definir os contornos e o ethos da contemporaneidade do circo ajuda a explorar suas manifestações de vanguarda. Há exemplos nas fronteiras, onde coexistem circo e dança, o burlesco, arte performática, não-atuação e engajamento político. A maioria das práticas avant-gardesão apresentadas em festivais internacionais. Elas não estão fora das normas, elas as estabelecem. Este artigo explora a interseção e, às vezes, complicada coabitação entre a concepção do contemporâneo e da vanguarda na prática e na recepção do circo atual. Primeiro, a contemporaneidade no circo de hoje é definida e contextualizada, propõe-se uma dialética do circo contemporâneo e conclui-se com propostas da vanguarda e como elas se relacionam com nossa compreensão atual do circo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it