Evaluation of Gas Turbine Performance in Power Plant with High-Pressure Fogging System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gas turbine power output is hypersensitive by environmental conditions, mainly in arid and hot climates.This research focuses on using a fogging air intake cooling system to improve the performance of the gas turbine in the weather conditions of Karbala city.The Aspen HYSYS software was used to simulate real data collected from the Karbala power plant (gas turbine).The simulation results were found for a gas turbine power plant with and without using the unit of air cooling.The results show there was a drop in inlet air temperature in the case of existence the cooling system when the ambient temperature in the range of (25 to 60)℃.The utilizing of air cooling technique with the gas turbine causes a gain in net power and thermal efficiency and reduction in the consumption of fuel.In addition, the heat rate reduces by 7% compared to not adding the system.However, the gas turbine plant shows better performance by employing the fogging system in the selected power plant when relative humidity below 40% and temperature exceed 30℃ during the summer months.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".