CNN-Based Laue Spot Morphology Predictor for Reliable Crystallographic Descriptor Estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Laue microdiffraction is an X-ray diffraction technique that allows for the non-destructive acquisition of spatial maps of crystallographic orientation and the strain state of (poly)crystalline specimens. To do so, diffraction patterns, consisting of thousands of Laue spots, are collected and analyzed at each location of the spatial maps. Each spot of these so-called Laue patterns has to be accurately characterized with respect to its position, size and shape for subsequent analyses including indexing and strain analysis. In the present paper, several approaches for estimating these descriptors that have been proposed in the literature, such as methods based on image moments or function fitting, are reviewed. However, with the increasing size and quantity of Laue image data measured at synchrotron sources, some datasets become unfeasible in terms of computational requirements. Moreover, for irregular Laue spots resulting, e.g., from overlaps and extended crystal defects, the exact shape and, more importantly, the position are ill-defined. To tackle these shortcomings, a procedure using convolutional neural networks is presented, allowing for a significant acceleration of the characterization of Laue spots, while simultaneously estimating the quality of a Laue spot for further analyses. When tested on unseen Laue spots, this approach led to an acceleration of 77 times using a GPU while maintaining high levels of accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".