Short-term effects of forest gap size on soil enzyme activity in a Platycladus orientalis plantation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Soil enzymes play a critical role in organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems. However, the effects of forest gaps on soil enzyme activities remain uncertain. Methods This study aims to investigate the short-term effects of forest gap size on soil enzyme activities in Platycladus orientalis plantations. We conducted a study in a 50-year Platycladus orientalis plantation in Xuzhou, sampling soils from three levels of forest gap size (4 m radius, S; 8 m radius, M and 12 m radius, L) at different positions (within gap, edge, and outside the gap) and control plots (CK, no gaps) 2a after the creation of gaps. Soil peroxidase, dehydrogenase, urease, and invertase activities were measured. Results Specifically, we found that M and S gaps had significantly ( p < 0.05) higher soil peroxidase activity at the outside position in April and October, respectively, than CK. Additionally, L gaps had significantly ( p < 0.05) higher soil dehydrogenase activity at the outside position in April than CK. Furthermore, L and S gaps had significantly ( p < 0.05) higher soil urease activity at the outside position in October and July, respectively, than CK. Lastly, L and S gaps had significantly ( p < 0.05) higher soil urease activity at the outside position in July than CK. Conclusion Our findings highlight the significant impact of canopy gaps on soil enzyme activities, which has important implications for forest management and conservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".