MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367184910

Globalmente resignados

2002· article· ca· W4367184910 on OpenAlexaff
Amartya Sen

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageca
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEmployment, Labor, and Gender Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Revista de Economía Institucional (ISSN impreso: 0124-5996; ISSN digital: 2346-2450) es una publicación plural, abierta a la discusión y difusión de trabajos teóricos e investigaciones en el área de la economía institucional. La Revista comenzó en 1999 y tiene cuatro secciones: artículos, clásicos, notas y discusiones, y reseñas. Busca divulgar los trabajos elaborados por investigadores de diversas universidades y centros de investigación colombianos e internacionales, con el fin de contribuir a conformar una comunidad académica congregada alrededor del libre examen. La Revista se publica en español, no obstante se incluyen traducciones del inglés, el francés y el italiano, entre otros. Los artículos se pueden consultar en medio magnético en la página web de la Revista [www.economiainstitucional.com], en las siguientes bases de datos: Colciencias (categoría B), SciELO, Repec, Red ALyC, Econlit, CSA, IBSS, Scopus, Latam-Studies, SSRN, HAPI, IBZ, IBR, Academic One File, EBSCO, Oceano, Proquest, Latindex, Clase, Ulrich’s, Dialnet, DOAJ, Open J-Gage, REDIB.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicEmployment, Labor, and Gender StudiesFrench-language works237,207