MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unsupervised representation learning of spontaneous MEG data with nonlinear ICA

2023· article· en· W4367187170 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yongjie Zhu, Tiina Parviainen, Erkka Heinilä, Lauri Parkkonen, Aapo Hyvärinen

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAcademy of FinlandEuropean Research CouncilCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsMagnetoencephalographyComputer scienceIndependent component analysisArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Unsupervised learningDecoding methodsGeneralizability theoryRepresentation (politics)Machine learningSpeech recognitionElectroencephalographyPsychologyNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) data show complex but structured spatiotemporal patterns. However, the neurophysiological basis of these signal patterns is not fully known and the underlying signal sources are mixed in MEG measurements. Here, we developed a method based on the nonlinear independent component analysis (ICA), a generative model trainable with unsupervised learning, to learn representations from resting-state MEG data. After being trained with a large dataset from the Cam-CAN repository, the model has learned to represent and generate patterns of spontaneous cortical activity using latent nonlinear components, which reflects principal cortical patterns with specific spectral modes. When applied to the downstream classification task of audio-visual MEG, the nonlinear ICA model achieves competitive performance with deep neural networks despite limited access to labels. We further validate the generalizability of the model across different datasets by applying it to an independent neurofeedback dataset for decoding the subject's attentional states, providing a real-time feature extraction and decoding mindfulness and thought-inducing tasks with an accuracy of around 70% at the individual level, which is much higher than obtained by linear ICA or other baseline methods. Our results demonstrate that nonlinear ICA is a valuable addition to existing tools, particularly suited for unsupervised representation learning of spontaneous MEG activity which can then be applied to specific goals or tasks when labelled data are scarce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.358

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImageSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207