Energy Consumption Optimization in RIS-Assisted Cooperative RSMA Cellular Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a downlink reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted half-duplex (HD) cooperative rate-splitting multiple access (C-RSMA) networks. The proposed system model is built up considering one base station (BS), one RIS, and two users. With the goal of minimizing the network energy consumption, a joint framework to optimize the precoding vectors at the BS, common stream split, relaying device transmit power, the time slot allocation, and the passive beamforming at the RIS subject to the power budget constraints at both the BS and the relaying node, the quality of service (QoS) constraints at both users, and a common stream rate constraint is proposed. The formulated problem is a non-convex optimization problem due to the high coupling among the optimization variables. To tackle this challenge, an efficient algorithm is presented by invoking the alternating optimization (AO) technique, which decomposes the original problem into two sub-problems; namely, sub-problem-1 and sub-problem-2, which are alternatively solved. Specifically, sub-problem-1 jointly optimizes the precoding vectors, common stream split, and relaying device power. Meanwhile, sub-problem-2 is to optimize the phase shift matrix at the RIS. In order to solve sub-problem-1, an efficient low-complexity solution based on the successive convex approximation (SCA) is proposed. Meanwhile, and with the aid of difference-of-convex (DC) rank-one representation and the SCA approach, an efficient solution for the phase shift matrix at the RIS is obtained. The simulation results demonstrate that the proposed RIS-assisted HD C-RSMA achieves a significant gain in minimizing the total energy consumption compared to the RIS-assisted RSMA scheme, RIS-assisted HD cooperative non-orthogonal multiple access (C-NOMA), RIS-assisted NOMA, HD C-RSMA without RIS, and HD C-NOMA without RIS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".