Médée et Jason : un couple pervers ? Lecture clinique d’un infanticide au regard de la relation du couple parental
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Praticiennes en psychiatrie légale, nous présenterons le parcours d’une patiente suivie dans une unité forensique, en reprenant son cheminement vers le passage à l’acte criminel, nous l’analyserons au regard des fonctions du mythe et de l’histoire de Médée. Notre propos s’articulera autour de réflexions psychopathologiques propres aux femmes auteurs d’infanticide, mettant en exergue les paradoxes de la féminité soulevés par le mythe et la place du couple homme/femme. Dans ce mythe, que peut figurer le couple Médée-Jason de la part perverse dans une relation amoureuse régie par des enjeux de domination entre les partenaires et comment l’issue d’une telle relation est-elle vouée, à une destruction du lien, voire du fruit de ce lien?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".