Auto-efficacité émotionnelle et conflit conjugal chez les amants1 camerounais : effet du type de relation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche étudiait, d’une part l’effet du type de relation sur l’auto-efficacité émotionnelle et le conflit conjugal; et d’autre part, le lien entre l’auto-efficacité émotionnelle et le conflit conjugal. Elle concernait 121 amants camerounais, issus de trois types de relation amoureuse. Les données collectées avec l’échelle révisée des stratégies de conflits conjugaux et celle de l’auto-efficacité émotionnelle, montrent que le type de relation a un effet sur le conflit conjugal (Wilk’s ∆ = 0,841, F(2,118) = 2,058, p = 0,029) et que l’auto-efficacité émotionnelle est un prédicteur des comportements agressifs en couple (β = -0,313, t(115) = -3,535, p = 0,001). Cette recherche souligne la place des compétences émotionnelles sur l’origine des conflits dans une relation intime et la nécessité de tenir compte de l’auto-efficacité émotionnelle, lorsque l’on aborde la question des comportements agressifs dans un contexte intime.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".