MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367291445 · doi:10.31289/agri.v4i1.7173

Analisis Wilayah dan Kontribusi Kakao Terhadap Pembangunan Daerah di Kabupaten Parigi Moutong

2022· article· id· W4367291445 on OpenAlexaff
Virda Zikria

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Agriuma · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Agroindustry Studies
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kakao merupakan salah satu komoditas perkebunan selain kelapa sawit, karet dan kopi yang memiliki peranan penting dalam perekonomian nasional dalam menghasilkan devisa negara, menyerap tenaga kerja serta sebagai penyedia bahan baku industri cokelat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi wilayah basis produksi komoditas kakao serta peranan kakao dalam mendukung pembangunan wilayah Kabupaten Parigi Mautong. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder periode waktu tahun 2017-2021. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis location quotient, lokalisasi, spesialisasi, analisis rasio layanan dasar dan regional multiplier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa daerah basis komoditas kakao di Kabupaten Parigi Moutong ada 12 kecamatan sehingga usahatani komoditas kakao tidak terkonsentrasi atau tidak terpusat hanya pada satu wilayah namun tersebar di beberapa wilayah kecamatan yang ada di Kabupaten Parigi Moutong. Usahatani komoditas kakao di wilayah basis tidak menspesialisasikan pada usahatani kakao. Komoditas kakao berperan dalam pembangunan wilayah dan ekonomi Kabupaten Parigi Moutong.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal AgriumaSame topicAgriculture and Agroindustry StudiesFrench-language works237,207