Structural configuration and tectonics of the Flemish Cap, offshore Newfoundland, from newly acquired seismic reflection data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the Flemish Cap played a pivotal role in the opening of the North Atlantic, the tectonic history of this continental ribbon has been poorly constrained owing to insufficient seismic coverage. In this study, we present 13 newly acquired seismic reflection profiles over the Flemish Cap, on which seismic reflectors show highly variable seismic facies both on and beneath the top acoustic basement, with exceptional imaging of layered crustal structure. The upper crust is primarily characterized by transparent, chaotic amplitude reflectivity. The lower crust, particularly on the flanks of the cap, exhibits relatively bright and coherent reflection packages interpreted as Appalachian orogenic fabrics based on onshore–offshore correlations from pre-rift plate reconstructions. Extensional systems within the continental crust of the Flemish Cap record a transitional stage between Paleozoic orogenic collapse and pre-Jurassic rifting. The crustal architecture associated with Mesozoic rifting of the Flemish Cap is also mapped and the interpreted distinct rift domains display along-strike variations. Overall, the complex tectonic history of the Flemish Cap involved dominantly ductile deformation during the Paleozoic orogenic stage, multiple deformation styles (primarily ductile and brittle–ductile) during the orogen-to-rift transitional stage and brittle deformation during the major Jurassic–Cretaceous rifting stage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".