MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367302757 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000203101

Integrated safety summary from Phase 3 clinical trials of IPX203, an extended-release carbidopa-levodopa formulation, in Parkinson disease (P1-11.006)

2023· article· en· W4367302757 on OpenAlexaff
Hubert H. Fernandez, Robert Hauser, Vanessa K. Hinson, Nirav Pavasia, Eric Molho, Leonid Zeitlin, Hester Visser, Richard D’Souza

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical studies and practices
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement Disorders
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse effectMedicineCarbidopaDosingLevodopaDyskinesiaPopulationClinical trialInternal medicineParkinson's diseaseAnesthesiaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To present the adverse event (AE) profile of IPX203 in the Phase 3 clinical trials in Parkinson disease (PD).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.483
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicPharmaceutical studies and practicesFrench-language works237,207