Using videos and films with people with major cognitive disorder living in care settings: A scoping review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The use of videos and films may improve the well-being of people with major cognitive disorder.Most literature about the use is within the community.There is a literature gap in the use in care settings.Exploring this gap is particularly timely during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering the lockdown of many care settings and the potential support that videos and films can be provided to people with the major cognitive disorder in these settings.In addition, compared with more complex technologies, videos and films are relatively inexpensive and easy to implement, making them more accessible.Objective: This scoping review aims to understand the facilitators and barriers to implementing videos and films with people with the major cognitive disorder in care settings, as well as the benefits and drawbacks of using this technology with this population.Method: This scoping review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology.It was conducted between May and July 2022.It followed a three-step search strategy: (1) identifying keywords from an initial broad search using two databases CINAHL and AgeLine; (2) doing a second search using all identified keywords and index terms across chosen databases (CINAHL, AgeLine, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Pro-Quest, and Google); and (3) hand-searching the reference lists of all selected articles for additional literature. Results:The final results included ten articles.Content analysis was conducted.Facilitators and barriers to implementing videos and films with people with the major cognitive disorder in care settings were identified.The benefits and drawbacks of using videos and films with this population were also identified.Conclusion: This scoping review presents current evidence on facilitators and barriers to implementing videos and films with people with the major cognitive disorder in care settings, and the benefits and drawbacks of using videos and films with this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it