Design Optimal Neural Network for Solving Unsteady State Confined Aquifer Problem
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the mathematical model of unsteady state horizontal radial flow in homogenous and anisotropic confined aquifers in polar coordinate which represented an important problem.We design optimal neural network to solve this problem.Also, we estimate the parameters of transmissivity aquifer with high accuracy.The optimality depending on choosing optimum architectural with suitable training algorithm and transfer function.The best design neural network is trained by new training algorithm say LNA.The retrained almost fast by suitable transferring function.Based on the modified architecture, the training and testing phases of the solving process are divided into two.The dataset is separated into three sections during the training phase: 60% of the training data, 20% of the validation data, and 20% of the test data.The total square error (TSE) for the trained phase with using the bach propagation algorithm (BPA) is 4.1499e+01 while it is 9.5898e-03 if we using suggested training algorithm (LNA).The LNA has a much smaller TSE when compared to the BPA.These much smaller values of the TSE indicate that LNA performs better than the BPA for the same number of iterations.So suggested architecture has many advantages such loss function computed on a random sample of the domain, high performance, avoid local minima and can be adapted for the online dynamic modeling, automation, control and robotics applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it