Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare Vol. 42 No. 2 (June 2015)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO THE SPECIAL ISSUE: NEW SCHOLARSHIP IN INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY Paul C. Luken and Suzanne Vaughan CAPTURED BY CARE: AN INSTITUTIONAL ETHNOGRAPHY ON THE WORK OF BEING IN A REHABILITATION PROCESS IN NORWAY Janne Paulsen Breimo A SERVICE DISPARITY FOR RURAL YOUTH: THE ORGANIZATION OF SOCIAL SERVICES ACROSS THE URBAN YOUTH CENTRE AND ITS RURAL BRANCH Jessica Braimoh CATEGORIES OF EXCLUSION: THE TRANSFORMATION OF FORMERLY INCARCERATED WOMEN INTO "ABLE-BODIED ADULTS WITHOUT DEPENDENTS" IN WELFARE PROCESSING Megan Welsh INTERROGATING THE RULING RELATIONS OF THAILAND'S POST-TSUNAMI RECONSTRUCTION: EMPIRICALLY TRACKING SOCIAL RELATIONS IN THE ABSENCE OF CONVENTIONAL TEXTS Aaron Williams and Janet Rankin (UN)SAFE AT SCHOOL: PARENTS' WORK OF SECURING NURSING CARE AND COORDINATING SCHOOL HEALTH SUPPORT SERVICES DELIVERY FOR CHILDREN WITH DIABETES IN ONTARIO SCHOOLS Lisa Watt TOWARDS AN INSTITUTIONAL COUNTERCARTOGRAPHY OF NURSES' WOUND WORK Nicola Waters Book Reviews This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. Naomi Klein Reviewed by Sheila D. Collins The Black Power Movement and American Social Work. Joyce Bell. Reviewed by Wilma Peebles-Wilkins Inequality in the Promised Land: Race, Resources, and Suburban Schooling. R. L'Heureux Lewis-McCoy. Reviewed by Paul L. Tractenberg It's Not Like I'm Poor: How Working Families Make Ends Meet in a Post-Welfare World. Sarah Halpern-Meekin, Kathryn Edin, Laura Tach, & Jennifer Sykes. Reviewed by Vanessa D. Wells Flawed System/Flawed Self: Joy Searching and Unemployment Experiences. Ofer Sharone. Reviewed by Randall P. Wilson Becoming Bureaucrats: Socialization at the Front Lines of Government Service. Zachary W. Oberfield . Reviewed by Edward U. Murphy Out in the Union: A Labor History of Queer America. Miriam Frank. Reviewed by Ann S. Holder
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".