MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367359592 · doi:10.1109/tnano.2023.3271308

A Novel Cascadable TCAM Using RRAM and Current Race Scheme for High-Speed Energy-Efficient Applications

2023· article· en· W4367359592 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistive random-access memoryElectronic engineeringComputer scienceStatic random-access memoryRobustness (evolution)Efficient energy useCMOSEnergy consumptionSpeedupMemristorEngineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, a novel ternary content addressable memory (TCAM) design is proposed using resistive random-access memory (RRAM) array in 2T2R configuration. The suggested memory array adopts the current-race (CR) sensing mechanism incorporated with a match-line (ML) booster in the sensing amplifier (SA) to improve energy efficiency, search speed and tolerance to RRAM switching variation. Several innovations are implemented to enhance the design further. For large TCAM arrays, match-line sensing amplifier (MLSA) direct cascading (DC) and an SR-latch cascading (SRC) schemes are proposed and compared in search speed, energy efficiency and MLSA noise margin. A same clock phase cascading (SCPC) scheme is also introduced to reduce latency in cascading structure by placing evaluation phase of all stages in the same clock phase. Furthermore, an RRAM-based tunable delay element (RRAM-TDE) is used in the TCAM design to provide flexibility and robustness against RRAM switching variation. The resulting system demonstrates excellent speed, energy and area efficiency against other TCAM designs using CMOS and emerging non-volatile memory (eNVM). To the best of our knowledge, the proposed 64-bit 1-stage TCAM system's speed and energy consumption match the best performance reported by other eNVM-based TCAM designs. The proposed design on a 128-bit 2-stage system also has speed and energy consumption comparable to SRAM-based TCAMs with the extra advantages of (a) compact size (90% reduction) and (b) non-volatility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score0.742

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it