The Feminist Movement in Paraguay: No Way but Forward
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Paraguayan feminist movement is a key sociopolitical actor in the questioning of the patriarchal regime and in the democratization of both state and society. The chapter presents a general characterization of the different phases of the movement and demonstrates how the decade of the 2010s was a turning point in terms of movement renewal. We argue that the trajectory and agenda of this movement have moved at a different pace than that of other Latin American feminist movements due to conditioning factors that include a domestic gender regime that lasted well into the 1990s, when many Latin American countries had already achieve a public gender regime. The repressive nature of the state and patriarchal values of society influenced the type of claims and mobilization of the Paraguay feminist movement. Because of the societal and political shifts in the 2000s (urbanization, neoliberalism, migration, reprimarization of the economy, mass protests), the movement was able to advance its claims and create a more sustainable dialogue with government actors in the 2010s. When a reversal of government occurred in 2012, this dialogue ended and eventually led to a renewal of the movement involving massive street protests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".