MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367360735 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2023.3267544

A Turnstile Quad-Ridge Orthomode Transducer (OMT) for Octave-Bandwidth Receiver Front-Ends (24–51 GHz)

2023· article· en· W4367360735 on OpenAlexaff
Doug Henke, Neal Kelly, Kyle Marshall, Ivan Wevers, L. B. G. Knee

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTurnstileWidebandBandwidth (computing)Polarization (electrochemistry)OpticsWaveguidePhysicsComputer scienceEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the design, fabrication, and measured results of a turnstile quad-ridge orthomode transducer (OMT) suitable for millimeter-wavelength receivers used in radio telescopes for astronomy. The quad-ridge OMT is directly compatible with a quad-ridge feed horn to implement dual-polarization low-noise receivers that exceed the single-mode bandwidth of a rectangular waveguide. Using a bandwidth of 24–51 GHz, the OMT demonstrated an insertion loss of 0.3–0.4 dB along with cross-polarization leakage and isolation below −40 dB. An OMT is a key part of a dual polarization receiver front-end, and our long-term goal is to realize low-noise, wideband receivers for radio astronomy utilizing ridge waveguides throughout the entire front-end. Design details are provided for each ridge waveguide feature within the OMT, including a quad-ridge waveguide turnstile junction, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$E$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -plane bend, and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$E$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -plane T-junction. To facilitate future layouts and integration, additional ridge waveguide component designs have been included for a 3-dB coupler, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$H$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -plane bend, and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$H$ </tex-math></inline-formula> -plane T-junction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and TechniquesSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207