Kinerja Pertumbuhan Ikan Lele Yang Dipelihara Dalam Sistem Budikdamber
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi kinerja pertumbuhan ikan lele yang dipelihara dalam sistem budikdamber sebagai rekomendasi sistem budidaya ikan dalam wadah kecil, tidak membutuhkan lahan yang luas, mudah didapatkan dan teknologinya dapat diterapkan oleh berbagai kalangan. Tahapan penelitian terdiri atas: a) Merancang sistem budidaya ikan, b) pemeliharaan ikan, c) analisa kinerja pertumbuhan ikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ikan yang dipeliharan dalam sistem budikdamber dengan menggunakan tanaman kangkung memiliki panjang dan bobot yang lebih baik yaitu panjang sebesar 20,79±3,49 cm dan bobot sebesar 63,58±29,29 g dibandingkan dengan sistem konvensional yaitu panjang 18,32±2,85 cm dan bobot 40,26±19,32 g. Sehingga disimpulkan bahwa pemeliharaan ikan dalam ember (budikdamber) dapat menjadi metode alternatif untuk diterapkan oleh masyarakat perkotaan yang memiliki keterbatasan lahan dalam memelihara ikan lele. Kata kunci : budidaya lele, budikdamber, lahan terbatas
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".