MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367469054 · doi:10.4000/books.igpde.16820

Valeur

2022· book-chapter· fr· W4367469054 on OpenAlexaff
David Carassus

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitut de la gestion publique et du développement économique eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Canadian institutionsOptech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’évaluation des politiques publiques se développe actuellement de manière importante dans des dimensions pratique et opérationnelle. Ainsi, à l’échelle locale, de nombreuses collectivités ont recours à des dispositifs internes ou externes pour évaluer leurs politiques. À l’échelle nationale, différentes évolutions légales ou institutionnelles, en particulier la Lolf, la modernisation de l’action publique ou encore récemment Action publique 2022, mettent aussi au premier plan la question éva...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0090.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2590.121

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitut de la gestion publique et du développement économique eBooksSame topicPhilosophical and Theoretical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207