El cacicazgo de la guaranga de los mitimaes yungas de Huamachuco (Perú) y la lucha entre dos autoridades étnicas por el poder, siglo XVI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo explora las prácticas sociopolíticas indígenas en la antigua provincia de Huamachuco (norte del Perú), a través del análisis de un documento legal de la primera década del siglo XVII. Se analiza un pleito sobre la organización política indígena del área, ilustrando sobre la interacción entre un cacicazgo en la sierra de Huamachuco y un cacicazgo en una zona intermedia entre la costa y la sierra, el de Simbal. Basados en este estudio de caso, y el análisis de los argumentos presentados por las partes, se concluye la presencia de una fuerte permanencia de prácticas políticas prehispánicas, incluso preínca, durante el comienzo del periodo colonial, lo que se constituye en un aporte al conocimiento de la historia local y los regionalismos del área referentes a cacicazgos coloniales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".