MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4367549660 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1278

Ammonia masers towards G 358.931−0.030

2023· article· en· W4367549660 on OpenAlexaff
Tiege McCarthy, S. L. Breen, Jane Kaczmarek, X Chen, S. Yu. Parfenov, А. М. Соболев, S. P. Ellingsen, Ross A. Burns, Gordon MacLeod, K Sugiyama, A L Brierley, S. P. van den Heever

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsDominion Astrophysical Observatory
FundersDivision of Arctic SciencesMinistry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian FederationNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsMaserPhysicsRadiative transferAstrophysicsExcited stateLine (geometry)Brightness temperatureEmission spectrumMegamaserBrightnessAtomic physicsAstronomySpectral lineOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We report the detection of ammonia masers in the non-metastable (6, 3), (7, 5), and (6, 5) transitions; the latter being the first unambiguous maser detection of that transition ever made. Our observations include the first very long baseline interferometry detection of ammonia maser emission, which allowed effective constraining of the (6, 5) maser brightness temperature. The masers were detected towards G 358.931−0.030, a site of 6.7-GHz class II methanol maser emission that was recently reported to be undergoing a period of flaring activity. These ammonia masers appear to be flaring contemporaneously with the class II methanol masers during the accretion burst event of G 358.931−0.030. This newly detected site of ammonia maser emission is only the 12th such site discovered in the Milky Way. We also report the results of an investigation into the maser pumping conditions, for all three detected masing transitions, through radiative transfer calculations constrained by our observational data. These calculations support the hypothesis that the ammonia (6, 5) maser transition is excited through high colour temperature infrared emission, with the (6, 5) and (7, 5) transition line ratio implying dust temperatures >400 K. Additionally, we detect significant linearly polarized emission from the ammonia (6, 3) maser line. Alongside our observational and radiative transfer calculation results, we also report newly derived rest frequencies for the ammonia (6, 3) and (6, 5) transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→