MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367598814 · doi:10.1097/crd.0000000000000559

Part 1: The Clinical Applications of Left Ventricular Myocardial Strain

2023· article· en· W4367598814 on OpenAlexaff
Malcolm Anastasius, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Annapoorna Kini, Edgar Argulian, Samin K. Sharma, Jagat Narula, Stamatios Lerakis

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology in Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsTed Rogers Centre for Heart ResearchToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEjection fractionCardiologyInternal medicineHeart failureStrain (injury)DiseaseCardiac function curveVentricular function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an increasing prevalence of cardiovascular disease and heart failure. Indices of left ventricular (LV) systolic function such as LV ejection fraction used to identify those at risk of adverse cardiac events such as heart failure may not be truly representative of LV systolic function in certain cardiac diseases. Given that LV ejection fraction reduction may represent more advanced irreversible stages of disease, measures of myocardial strain have emerged as a feasible and robust instrument for the early identification of heart disease and subtle LV systolic dysfunction. The purpose of this review was to provide an overview of myocardial strain concepts and emerging clinical applications of global longitudinal strain in cardio-oncology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiology in ReviewSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207