Le traitement de la violence conjugale comme un enjeu de SST au Canada : une étude empirique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La violence conjugale (VC) est un enjeu important pour les milieux de travail, et ce, tant du point de vue de la productivité que de la sécurité au travail. Pourtant, au Québec et au Canada, la conception de la VC en tant que dimension de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (SST) est relativement récente. Peu d’études sur la VC et le travail portent sur des interventions, et encore moins sur celles de nature préventive. Cette étude contribue à combler cette lacune. Elle présente les résultats d’une série d’entretiens avec des informatrices-clés dans différentes juridictions canadiennes où la législation en SST vise la VC. L’étude suggère que, pour que la législation puisse atteindre son but, la sensibilisation à la VC dans les milieux de travailreprésente un élément incontournable. De plus, les ressources communautaires spécialisées en VC ont un rôle crucial à jouer dans la mise en œuvre de la législation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".