MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4367677018 · doi:10.7554/elife.86784.1.sa1

Reviewer #2 (Public Review): Structural insight into guanylyl cyclase receptor hijacking of the kinase–Hsp90 regulatory mechanism

2023· peer-review· en· W4367677018 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nathanael A. Caveney, Naotaka Tsutsumi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHeat shock proteins research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthG. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers FoundationHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsHsp90GUCY2DDruggabilityKinaseCell biologyChaperone (clinical)BiologyMechanism (biology)ReceptorChemistryGuanylate cyclase 2CBiochemistryCyclaseMedicineHeat shock proteinGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Membrane receptor guanylyl cyclases play a role in many important facets of human physiology, ranging from regulation of blood pressure to the regulation of intestinal fluid secretion. The structural mechanisms which influence the regulation of these important physiological effects have yet to be explored. We present the 3.9 Å resolution cryoEM structure of the human membrane receptor guanylyl cyclase GC-C in complex with Hsp90 and its co-chaperone Cdc37, providing insight into the mechanism of Cdc37 mediated binding of GC-C to the Hsp90 regulatory complex. As a membrane protein and non-kinase client of Hsp90–Cdc37, this work shows remarkable plasticity of Cdc37 to interact with a broad array of clients having significant sequence variation. Further, this work shows how membrane receptor guanylyl cyclases hijack the regulatory mechanisms used for active kinases to facilitate their regulation. Given the known druggability of Hsp90, these insights can guide the further development of mGC targeted therapeutics and lead to new avenues to treat hypertension, inflammatory bowel disease, and other mGC related conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.170
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.170
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0190.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat shock proteins research→French-language works237,207→