Hybrid neural network-based metaheuristics for prediction of financial markets: a case study on global gold market
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Technical analysis indicators are popular tools in financial markets. These tools help investors to identify buy and sell signals with relatively large errors. The main goal of this study is to develop new practical methods to identify fake signals obtained from technical analysis indicators in the precious metals market. In this paper, we analyze these indicators in different ways based on the recorded signals for 10 months. The main novelty of this research is to propose hybrid neural network-based metaheuristic algorithms for analyzing them accurately while increasing the performance of the signals obtained from technical analysis indicators. We combine a convolutional neural network and a bidirectional gated recurrent unit whose hyperparameters are optimized using the firefly metaheuristic algorithm. To determine and select the most influential variables on the target variable, we use another successful recently developed metaheuristic, namely, the moth-flame optimization algorithm. Finally, we compare the performance of the proposed models with other state-of-the-art single and hybrid deep learning and machine learning methods from the literature. Finally, the main finding is that the proposed neural network-based metaheuristics can be useful as a decision support tool for investors to address and control the enormous uncertainties in the financial and precious metals markets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".