MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367834306 · doi:10.1007/s00330-023-09661-6

Computed high-b-value high-resolution DWI improves solid lesion detection in IPMN of the pancreas

2023· article· en· W4367834306 on OpenAlexaff
F Harder, E. Jung, Kilian Weiss, Markus M. Graf, Omar Kamal, Sean McTavish, Anh T. Van, İhsan Ekin Demir, Helmut Frieß, Veit Phillip, Roland M. Schmid, Fabian Lohöfer, Georgios Kaissis, Marcus R. Makowski, Dimitrios C. Karampinos, Rickmer Braren

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Radiology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersTechnische Universität München
KeywordsMedicineNuclear medicineRadiologyLesionDiffusion MRINeuroradiologyIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmImage qualityEffective diffusion coefficientVoxelUltrasoundMagnetic resonance imagingPancreasPathologyInternal medicineNeurology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives To examine the effect of high- b -value computed diffusion-weighted imaging (cDWI) on solid lesion detection and classification in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and histopathology as a standard of reference. Methods Eighty-two patients with known or suspected IPMN were retrospectively enrolled. Computed high- b -value images at b = 1000 s/mm 2 were calculated from standard ( b = 0, 50, 300, and 600 s/mm 2 ) DWI images for conventional full field-of-view (fFOV, 3 × 3 × 4 mm 3 voxel size) DWI. A subset of 39 patients received additional high-resolution reduced-field-of-view (rFOV, 2.5 × 2.5 × 3 mm 3 voxel size) DWI. In this cohort, rFOV cDWI was compared against fFOV cDWI additionally. Two experienced radiologists evaluated (Likert scale 1–4) image quality (overall image quality, lesion detection and delineation, fluid suppression within the lesion). In addition, quantitative image parameters (apparent signal-to-noise ratio (aSNR), apparent contrast-to-noise ratio (aCNR), contrast ratio (CR)) were assessed. Diagnostic confidence regarding the presence/absence of diffusion - restricted solid nodules was assessed in an additional reader study. Results High- b -value cDWI at b = 1000 s/mm 2 outperformed acquired DWI at b = 600 s/mm 2 regarding lesion detection, fluid suppression, aCNR, CR, and lesion classification ( p = < .001–.002). Comparing cDWI from fFOV and rFOV revealed higher image quality in high - resolution rFOV-DWI compared to conventional fFOV-DWI ( p ≤ .001–.018). High- b -value cDWI images were rated non-inferior to directly acquired high- b -value DWI images ( p = .095–.655). Conclusions High- b -value cDWI may improve the detection and classification of solid lesions in IPMN. Combining high-resolution imaging and high- b -value cDWI may further increase diagnostic precision. Clinical relevance statement This study shows the potential of computed high-resolution high-sensitivity diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for solid lesion detection in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia (IPMN). The technique may enable early cancer detection in patients under surveillance. Key Points • Computed high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (cDWI) may improve the detection and classification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) of the pancreas. • cDWI calculated from high-resolution imaging increases diagnostic precision compared to cDWI calculated from conventional-resolution imaging. • cDWI has the potential to strengthen the role of MRI for screening and surveillance of IPMN, particularly in view of the rising incidence of IPMNs combined with now more conservative therapeutic approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean RadiologySame topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207