MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367834336 · doi:10.1093/jsxmed/qdad040

Characterizing the innervation of the vulvar vestibule and the immunohistochemical features of neuroproliferative vestibulodynia

2023· article· en· W4367834336 on OpenAlexaff
Diane Tomalty, Olivia Giovannetti, Stephen Magliocchetti, André Williams, Johanna L. Hannan, Barry R. Komisaruk, S Goldstein, Irwin Goldstein, Michael A. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Sexual Medicine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSexual function and dysfunction studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnatomyMedicineVestibuleNerve plexusVulvodyniaPathologyImmunohistochemistryPudendal nerveVestibular systemPelvic painSurgeryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is a chronic pain condition characterized by allodynia localized to the vulvar vestibule. The finding of increased densities of nerve fibers in the vestibular mucosa of patients with PVD has led to the identification of a neuroproliferative subtype. The etiology of PVD, including neuroproliferative vestibulodynia (NPV), is not fully understood. The gross and microscopic innervation of the vulvar vestibule remains incompletely described, despite the preliminary data supporting the role of peripheral innervation in PVD. AIM: To characterize the gross anatomic and microscopic innervation of the vulvar vestibule through cadaveric dissection and immunohistochemistry. METHODS: The pudendal nerve and inferior hypogastric plexus (IHP) were dissected using 6 cadaveric donors. Histology and immunohistochemistry were used to confirm patterns of innervation identified gross anatomically. Immunohistochemistry was performed on vestibulectomy specimens obtained from 6 patients diagnosed with NPV and compared with cadaveric vestibular tissues. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included (1) dissection of pelvic innervation and (2) immunohistochemical localization of markers for the following: general innervation protein gene product 9.5 (PGP9.5), sensory innervation (calcitonin gene-related peptide), autonomic innervation (vasoactive intestinal polypeptide, tyrosine hydroxylase), neuroproliferation (nerve growth factor [NGF]), and immune activation (C-kit). RESULTS: Perineal (pudendal) nerve branches were traced to the external wall of the vulvar vestibule. Some anatomic heterogeneity was observed in perineal nerve-branching patterns. Fibers from the IHP were identified in close proximity to the vulvar vestibule. Autonomic and sensory nerve fibers were identified in both patient and cadaveric vulvar vestibule samples. Patient samples were characterized by the proliferation of PGP9.5-positive nerve fibers and C-kit-positive mast cells, which were in proximity to neve bundles and showed coexpression with putative NGF-positive cells. NGF expression was localized to a subset of nerves, including those that demonstrated co-expression of sensory and autonomic nerve markers. Increased densities of autonomic fibers positive for vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and tyrosine hydroxylase were observed in 1 patient sample. CLINICAL TRANSLATION: Heterogeneity in gross and microscopic patterns of innervation could explain variability in clinical response to treatment and should be used to inform future therapeutic interventions. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study used a combination of approaches to elucidate the innervation of the vulvar vestibule, including in NPV. The small sample size is a limitation. CONCLUSION: The vulvar vestibule contains both sensory and autonomic innervation, which may originate from the pudendal nerve and IHP. Our results support the existence of a neuroproliferative subtype that is characterized by the proliferation of sensory and autonomic nerve fibers and neuroimmune interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Sexual MedicineSame topicSexual function and dysfunction studiesFrench-language works237,207