Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hannah Wunsch Greystone Books; May 2023; 360 pages. ISBN-10: 1771649453 ISBN-13: 978-1771649452 When I was too young to understand what polio was, I was aware that it was something to fear. In my mind I carry an image of a child in an iron lung from a Hollywood film, and I recall being taken to the village school for a vaccine injection. This book tells a story of polio and the epidemic that ripped through Copenhagen in the early 1950 s, driving a revolution in medical care that is still evolving. Poliomyelitis is an infectious disease that waxed and waned throughout the first half of the 20th century. The population of the United States was at greatest risk in late spring and early summer, but in Scandinavia numbers peaked in the Autumn, where it was called the Autumn Ghost. Hannah Wunsch, a Canadian intensivist, weaves together the history of the disease, and the lives of the Americans and Danes who played their parts in its eradication, though what haunts the reader is the picture she paints of small blue faces, desperately struggling to get air into their lungs as they died. Clearly a great deal of research has gone into the book, with a wealth of personal detail that breathes life into the narrative. There are parallels with the Covid 19 pandemic everywhere, but then there was so much more ground to cover, and it took years. As with Covid, there were false starts, red herrings and disinformation, but the questions that needed answers were the same. The story moves smoothly back and forth through the years and between the USA and Denmark. The US, with its wealth had an abundance of iron lungs, but Denmark, emerging from years of Nazi occupation during the second world war, could afford only one. This imbalance led to an experiment with positive pressure ventilation to treat respiratory failure in Copenhagen. From this experience the intensive therapy unit was born. While there were many who made their contribution, it is the story of Bjorn Ibsen, the man who risked his reputation, that stands out. I was also very interested in the role of Poul Astrup, having been given an early Astrup machine for my first research project. If I had understood his pioneering genius then I would not have complained about having to recalibrate it every half an hour. Despite its title, it is written in American English, with American units. There were a couple of places where I itched for my editor's pencil, but this did not detract; the book is a good read. The story is illustrated by black and white photographs that add to the period atmosphere. I could not help being slightly shocked by the picture of the medical students in their white tunics, on their cigarette break. The book is intended for a wide readership. With this in mind, throughout the story there are explanations of some of the technical aspects of care. I was a bit sceptical about some of these at first, but then I read the author's explanation of a ‘blood gas’, that I thought was masterful, and decided the lay reader is in good hands. For those involved in anaesthesiology and intensive care there are many historical insights here that were new to me. This is not a text book, it is a story that would be worthy of reading even if there was no clinical connection. Read this and you will understand how intensive therapy was born. Gordon Lyons
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".