Signed Distance Correlation (SiDCo): an online implementation of distance correlation and partial distance correlation for data-driven network analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: There is a need for easily accessible implementations that measure the strength of both linear and non-linear relationships between metabolites in biological systems as an approach for data-driven network development. While multiple tools implement linear Pearson and Spearman methods, there are no such tools that assess distance correlation. RESULTS: We present here SIgned Distance COrrelation (SiDCo). SiDCo is a GUI platform for calculation of distance correlation in omics data, measuring linear and non-linear dependencies between variables, as well as correlation between vectors of different lengths, e.g. different sample sizes. By combining the sign of the overall trend from Pearson's correlation with distance correlation values, we further provide a novel "signed distance correlation" of particular use in metabolomic and lipidomic analyses. Distance correlations can be selected as one-to-one or one-to-all correlations, showing relationships between each feature and all other features one at a time or in combination. Additionally, we implement "partial distance correlation," calculated using the Gaussian Graphical model approach adapted to distance covariance. Our platform provides an easy-to-use software implementation that can be applied to the investigation of any dataset. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The SiDCo software application is freely available at https://complimet.ca/sidco. Supplementary help pages are provided at https://complimet.ca/sidco. Supplementary Material shows an example of an application of SiDCo in metabolomics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".