Corporate venture capital contributions to strategic renewal: Neglected paths and barriers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Research Summary Via a study of the corporate venture capital (CVC) unit of a multinational corporation, we examine how CVC contributes to strategic renewal. We find the commonly featured direct path to renewal to have limited impact as access to venture technology is constrained by key external institutional barriers. By contrast, we highlight a less studied, but potentially more important, indirect path: the unit's and hence the parent corporation's access to a high‐technology ecosystem. Obstacles on this path are internal and organizational: including challenges of integration, goal disparities, and competition for resources and credit between the CVC unit and corporate parent. The significance of the indirect path and revelation of understudied institutional and organizational barriers suggest new directions for rechanneling and contextualizing studies of CVC. Managerial Summary We studied the corporate venture capital (CVC) unit of a large multinational firm to discover how such investments can have strategic contributions to the parent firm. We found numerous obstacles in using technological knowledge from the ventures the unit invests in because of legal and reputation barriers against disseminating proprietary information. By contrast, opportunities abound from participating in an entrepreneurial ecosystem to which the CVC activities provide access. These expose the unit to the promises and challenges of emerging technologies and fields, providing important information the unit is free to share with the parent to guide strategic renewal. To do so, however, managers must overcome substantial organizational, political, and resource barriers between the CVC unit and the parent corporation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it