MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367838518 · doi:10.1109/sm57895.2023.10112562

Smart Mobility for Sustainable Development Goals: Enablers and Barriers

2023· article· en· W4367838518 on OpenAlexaff
Alaa Khamis, Suzette Malek

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsGeneral Motors (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnablingSustainabilitySustainable developmentKey (lock)Reliability (semiconductor)Computer scienceSmart cityBusinessComputer securityTelecommunicationsRisk analysis (engineering)Internet of Things

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smart mobility is a wide umbrella to different systems and services to meet various end-user needs such as safety, seamless accessibility, reliability, and affordability without compromising the collective good of the society and the environment in terms of reduced congestion, reduced emission, and sustainability. Emerging smart mobility systems and services can play instrumental roles in achieving several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by UN Member States. This paper sheds light on the roles of smart mobility as an enabler to sustainable development in developed and developing countries. The paper also discusses a few barriers that need to be properly handled to achieve the full potential of smart mobility technology as a key enabler to achieve SDGs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207