MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4367843559 · doi:10.3389/falgy.2023.1056619

Anaphylaxis induced by mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: follow-up and booster dose after previous desensitization

2023· article· en· W4367843559 on OpenAlexaff
Ibtihal AlOtaibi, Faisal ALMuhizi, Shaonie Ton-Leclerc, Michael Fein, Christos Tsoukas, Lene H. Garvey, Derek Lee, Moshe Ben‐Shoshan, Ghislaine Annie Clarisse Isabwe, Ana Maria Copaescu

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Allergy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal General HospitalMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnaphylaxisDesensitization (medicine)MedicineBooster (rocketry)Booster doseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)AllergyDrug allergyImmunologyAnesthesiaPharmacologyInternal medicineImmunizationAntigenInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article Front. Allergy, 03 May 2023Sec. Drug, Venom & Anaphylaxis Volume 4 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1056619

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.943

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in AllergySame topicFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchFrench-language works237,207